[WHO WILL REPORT WHEN ALL THE REPORTERS ARE GONE?]

"I'm a smarmy intellect from a Baltimore newspaper, ya'see?"

"I'm a smarmy intellect from a Baltimore newspaper, ya'see?"

Advancements in technology are not without loss. With the rise of all new things comes the death of others. Typewriters, newspapers, religion, the album, etc.

But last week I pieced together a tragic, tangential, unintended consequence of our fracturing media landscape. Namely, the death of the grizzled, veteran, hard-nosed reporter protagonist.

Among books, TV, and movies, this character, and this genre is no longer viable. More scary, of course, is that this is a direct result of this “character” fading from the real world as well.

Being a newspaperman used to mean something. Ask David Simon. It was a position of unique independence that encouraged and rewarded those brave and sharp enough to challenge power—whether it was the corruption and inhumane practices of an entire industry or the machinations of a power-hungry president

We all know the archetype: rumpled, ornery, rabble-rousers who drank too much and didn’t care who they offended. But they were heros! Guided by a set of principles that had nothing to do with ratings or whether the holding company would approve! The stress of bringing the truth! The honor with accuracy! The deadlines! The late nights seeking out answers! For us!

But as I recently, and coincidentally, in sequence, just witnessed through the last two weeks of my Netflix features, there is no way the storied, fictional depictions of reporters from countless books, television, and film can survive the internet—much like the plight of their very non-fictional counterparts.

As contemporaries, we can image the life of serfs in kingdom’s past or the nuances of royalty from centuries gone, but it’s entirely feasible that generations to come will have no frame of reference for Gene Kelly’s E.K Hornbeck in Inherit the Wind, Dustin and Rob’s portrayal of Carl and Bob in All the President’s Men, Al Pacino’s “60 Minutes” producer Lowell Bergman in The Insider or Sally Field’s Meg Carter in Absence of Malice. How tragic!

Who will fill this vacancy in future entertainment? Power Digg users?

Perhaps I’m being paranoid, if not a bit nostalgic, in my wolf-crys of doom for the “news media” entertainment genre. But if the  ”reporter trumps THE MAN” protagonist disappears entirely from our cultural worldview who or what will inspire the next generation of fearless muckrakers?

Or perhaps our descent into journ-a-tainment is already complete and they are all applying for internships at TMZ.

4 Comments to WHO WILL REPORT WHEN ALL THE REPORTERS ARE GONE?

  1. Mark's Gravatar Mark
    February 10, 2009 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    I feel like there’s always going to be market for legit news. Someone on the internet is going to figure that out and make a lot of money as cable news makes its decent into crap-ville.

    Maybe even after more of our newspapers die off, a few decent ones will make their home online. I read the New York Time online once in a while and the format works just fine.

    As a random side note, remember the Lone Gunmen from the X-files? Those guys were awesome.
    (Non-dorks click here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lone_Gunmen)

  2. admin's Gravatar admin
    February 11, 2009 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    I have my doubts that the expensive, time-intensive investigative journalism can survive without deep pockets to support it. And with Internet journalism largely reduced to blogs about what people can see out their windows, I’m not sure the Fourth Estate can remain the stalwart defender of the little guy and the lost cause.

  3. February 12, 2009 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    I agree – there is a demand, I also agree that there’s gotta be some sort of funding or ad-based revenue model. I don’t know how long “free” is going to work for something as important as real fourth-estate journalism. At some point, you get what you pay for. And that’s disturbing if nobody’s paying anything.

  4. hbj's Gravatar hbj
    March 18, 2009 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    It’s time to wake up and smell the stolen coffee.

    Just cause there’s a demand doesn’t mean someone can make enough money off it to generate a profit off a good product.

    If anything can be legally copied anywhere (legally, in that apparently no one gives a damn), there is no revenue model for news comparable to paper.

    Take it from the (now defunct) music business.

[Comment]

Twits

Nail on Facebook